In solidarity for the brave actions of lone blogger Greg Renouf, I post my recent letter to the RCMP task force on threats to National Security.
From: Heather Martin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: July 28, 2012 1:26:36 PM CDT (CA)
Subject: Fwd: Public Declaration to Police Officers, Civil Servants and other Agents of the Crown of England – Issued by the Judicial Oversight Panel of the Common Law Court of Justice investigating Crimes of Church and State (Brussels-London) – for global distribution.
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to voice my concerns about an individual who, I believe through his actions and public statements poses a significant threat to the security of Canadian citizens and the RCMPolice and municipal police forces.
Over the past several weeks I have come to know of Mr. Kevin Annett through his work in exposing some of the more serious crimes committed at Canadian residential schools. These crimes, he alleges, involve the genocide of almost 50,000 children who he states are buried on residential school grounds. He has been actively seeking support internationally for an organization he created called the ITCCS (International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State) which he claims is conducting a tribunal with ‘citizen jurors’ where the Vatican, the Queen of England and Stephen Harper have been summonsed to appear. Although no hard evidence exists that these summons have been served, Mr. Annett’s language in many ‘press-releases’ and ‘action-alerts’ shows a distinct obsession and hatred for certain members of the United Church (which defrocked him in 1995), for the Pope, and for Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
Equally disturbing is his reaction in the past two weeks regarding increasing pressure by myself and a few other individuals to explain his behavior and rationale. Because we question him, we are labelled ‘black-operatives’ and are accused of ‘bad-jacketing’. These are terms that refer to some of the covert tactics used by intelligence organizations such as the CIA and suggests that Mr. Annett understands the use of psychological manipulation.
I am forwarding this message I’ve received and it is the reason for my writing to you. Up until this point these individuals and myself have been working at exposing the nature of Mr. Annett’s deception to the public, by engaging in dialogue with some of his supporters via Facebook, and forums, etc. I have questioned Mr. Annett directly via e-mail regarding the ITCCS and it’s legitimacy as judicial body. I have been met with irritation that I would question him and not simply take his allegations as the gospel truth.
I have since had serious concerns that by his actions he may create a situation that will inflame the anti-establishmentarian’s to act in a radical manner. He openly opposes peaceful protest and has participated in the Occupy movement conducted actions such as “Occupy the Vatican” and “Occupy the Church” and uses inflammatory language that implies that the RCMP are complicit in the murders of aboriginal children and women.
The problem as I see it is that he has quite a bit of support for his efforts (which seem less aimed at helping the survivors of the residential schools, and more about a personal vendetta which has been nurtured since he was young against the Church and our government). The Declaration (below) implies that the ITCCS ‘court’ has power, has legal standing, has the authority to act outside of the ‘rule of law’ in Canada and has power over officers who do not comply with the ITCCS’s mandate. It raises questions in my mind about the sanity of this man and his ability (through opportunism, manipulation and charisma) to stir emotions that may end up in people getting hurt. I respect the law enforcement officers of this country and know that the majority uphold the values and integrity of their organizations. It is a sad day in our country when a rogue anarchist can become judge, jury, and (God forbid) executioner.
I thank you for your time in reading this letter and hope that you can appreciate the seriousness of this mans actions.
I am happy to discuss this further and am available to speak with by phone on Monday and Tuesday at your convenience (1-XXX-XXX-XXXX)
I am also attaching some additional documents for your consideration.